Internal:CDT3D SU2: Difference between revisions

From crtc.cs.odu.edu
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ctsolakis (talk | contribs)
Ctsolakis (talk | contribs)
Line 3: Line 3:
* Pointwise and SU2 [https://blog.pointwise.com/2018/03/14/high-lift-prediction-using-su2-v6-falcon-pointwise/]
* Pointwise and SU2 [https://blog.pointwise.com/2018/03/14/high-lift-prediction-using-su2-v6-falcon-pointwise/]
* Paper : Construction of Prism and Hex Layers from Anisotropic Tetrahedra [https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2015-2296] see also  [http://www.pointwise.com/theconnector/2017-Q1/Mesh-Generation-NASA-High-Lift-Common-Research-Model.html]
* Paper : Construction of Prism and Hex Layers from Anisotropic Tetrahedra [https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2015-2296] see also  [http://www.pointwise.com/theconnector/2017-Q1/Mesh-Generation-NASA-High-Lift-Common-Research-Model.html]
* SU2 + refine + CDT3D [http://www.cs.odu.edu/crtc/SU2/delta_wing_005.avi]


== Interesting points from SU2 developers ==
== Interesting points from SU2 developers ==

Revision as of 11:19, 22 November 2018

General

  • Oct 30 2018 presentation [1]
  • Pointwise and SU2 [2]
  • Paper : Construction of Prism and Hex Layers from Anisotropic Tetrahedra [3] see also [4]
  • SU2 + refine + CDT3D [5]

Interesting points from SU2 developers

  • linear scalability is expected if there are at least 5000 grid points per core. [6]

BL discussion with Beckett

For the target method RANS+LES boundary layer is needed to resolve the turbulance. Specifically for the Delta wing see thje link bellow for more details of the simulation. During the fine-tunning of the mesh it it expected to require changes mostly in the boundary layer, since, this is where the turbulance near the boundary ( which we are trying to resolve) lives.

Boundary layer is usually given the following restrictions:

  • Δs: Distance of first cell from the solid surface
  • Thickness of the boundary layer
  • Stretching factor / number of layers