Internal:Metric Adaptive CDT3D: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* [https://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/0715011 An Efficient Method to Solve the Minmax Problem Directly, C. Charalambous and A. R. Conn ] [http://www.cs.odu.edu/crtc/internal/Christos/Charalambous_An_Efficient_Method_To_Solve_The_Minmax_problem_directly.pdf PDF] | * [https://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/0715011 An Efficient Method to Solve the Minmax Problem Directly, C. Charalambous and A. R. Conn ] [http://www.cs.odu.edu/crtc/internal/Christos/Charalambous_An_Efficient_Method_To_Solve_The_Minmax_problem_directly.pdf PDF] | ||
* [[Internal:ACDT3D_Quality_Criteria | Comparison for quality criteria for ACDT3D]] | * [[Internal:ACDT3D_Quality_Criteria | Comparison for quality criteria for ACDT3D]] | ||
* [[Internal:ACDT3D_(Scitech2018)_stability_data | Stability Data for 500k]] | |||
[[#Contents | Back To Top]] | [[#Contents | Back To Top]] | ||
= Stability for 500k case= | = Stability for 500k case= | ||
== Comparison of Quality Metric using different amount of cores and surface adaptation == | == Comparison of Quality Metric using different amount of cores and surface adaptation == | ||
Revision as of 16:40, 31 May 2018
Delta Wing (Scitech 2018)
Cube (polar-2 metric) (Scitech 2018)
This approach offers no boundary adaptation.
General Notes
- smoothing : Tetrahedral Mesh Improvement Using Swapping and Smoothing, Lori A. Freitag and Carl Ollivier-Gooch PDF
- An Efficient Method to Solve the Minmax Problem Directly, C. Charalambous and A. R. Conn PDF
- Comparison for quality criteria for ACDT3D
- Stability Data for 500k
Stability for 500k case
Comparison of Quality Metric using different amount of cores and surface adaptation
Comparison of Quality Metric using different amount of cores and mesh reconstruction
Comparison Surface Adaptation vs Mesh Reconstruction (reproducibility)
TODO needs update
Surface adaptation offers better edge lengths but mesh reconstruction slightly better mean ratio quality