Internal:ACDT3D Scitech2018

Results

First Method

case: cube polar-2 metric going from 8K complexity to 500k

case: delta wing going from 5K complexity to 500k

Second Method

Starting from a 50K Complexity volume mesh

Results include no boundary adaptation

Size of initial mesh

Vertices : 104,305

Tetrahedra: 581,196

1M Complexity (~12M Tetrahedra)

software-name	Cores	TPrep	TE2E	Ne	Np	Speede (elms/sec)	Speedp (points/sec)	Specs
CDT3D	24 + 24HT	2.15	72.73	11,130,150	1,865,647	140,878.13	23,522.20	[1]

more data here : here

10M Complexity (~120M Tetrahedra)

software-name	Cores	TPrep	TE2E	Ne	Np	Speede (elms/sec)	Speedp (points/sec)	Specs
CDT3D	24 + 24HT	2.41	1,277.66	109,884,436	18,365,004	85,388.49	14,265.39	[1]

more data here : here

100M Complexity (~1.2B Tetrahedra)

software-name	Cores	TPrep	TE2E	Ne	Np	Speede (elms/sec)	Speedp (points/sec)	Specs
CDT3D	24 + 24HT	2.90	21,572.60	1,096,524,832	183,097,400	50,795.75	8,481.52	[1]

more data here : here

[1] 24 hardware cores Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-2697v2@2.70 GHz, 757 GB RAM and Hyper-threading Support

Third Method

Internal:ACDT3D#Scalable_complexity

Paper

private copy https://www.overleaf.com/16395011txvdwjnhcvmm

public https://www.overleaf.com/15174959jmkkqdctrvyb

50k to 500k complexity detailed data